Nov 8, 6:50 PM EST
Court Ruling Halts Guantanamo Proceedings
By PAISLEY DODDS
Associated Press Writer
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba (AP) -- A U.S. federal court ruled
Monday that Osama bin Laden's driver was entitled to a legal hearing on
whether he is a prisoner of war - a landmark opinion that could prevent
military trials of alleged enemy combatants held at Guantanamo Bay.
The government said it would immediately seek a stay of that ruling and file an appeal.
It was the first time a federal court halted legal proceedings
before U.S. military commissions, resurrected from World War II, at the
Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. No trials have been held, although tentative
trial dates for four detainees had been scheduled.
A U.S. District Court judge in Washington halted the pretrial
proceedings of Salim Ahmed Hamdan, 34, of Yemen, after his lawyers
filed a petition. Hamdan - who is charged with conspiracy to commit war
crimes, murder and terrorism and says that he never supported terrorism
- was to be the first detainee tried, on Dec. 7.
The judge rejected the U.S. government's contention that Hamdan and
other detainees are not prisoners of war but enemy combatants, a
classification affording fewer legal protections under the Geneva
Conventions. Hamdan was declared an enemy combatant last month by a
review tribunal during a hearing his lawyer was barred from.
"Unless and until a competent tribunal determines that petitioner is
not entitled to protections afforded prisoners of war under Article 4
of the Geneva Convention ... of Aug. 12, 1949, he may not be tried by
military commission for the offenses with which he is charged," U.S.
District Judge James Robertson said.
"There is nothing in this record to suggest that a competent
tribunal has determined that Hamdan is not a prisoner of war under the
Geneva Conventions."
The court also ruled that unless the military commission guidelines
are changed to conform to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Hamdan
cannot be tried by the commissions and must be moved from the
pre-commission wing at the Camp Delta prison camp to the general
population.
Four terror suspects set to go before the commissions were moved out of solitary cells recently to a pre-commission wing.
In Washington, U.S. Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo said
the government would appeal the ruling on the grounds that the Geneva
Conventions do not apply to members or affiliates of al-Qaida.
"We vigorously disagree with the court's decision, and will seek an
emergency stay of the ruling and immediately appeal," Corallo said in a
statement on the department's Web site.
"We believe the President properly determined that the Geneva
Conventions have no legal applicability to members or affiliates of
al-Qaida ...
"The process struck down by the district court today was carefully
crafted to protect America from terrorists while affording those
charged with violations of the laws of war with fair process, and the
Department will make every effort to have this process restored through
appeal."
He added that the judge's ruling "has put terrorism on the same legal footing as legitimate methods of waging war."
Hamdan's civilian defense attorney, Neal Katyal, said the district court ruling could set a precedent for all the detainees.
"The judge's decision was designed to cover the case of Mr. Hamdan,
but the spirit of it potentially could extend more broadly to perhaps
everything that happens at Guantanamo Bay," Katyal said.
The ruling in Washington came as lawyers began pretrial motions in
Hamdan's case. The commission's presiding officer, Army Col. Peter E.
Brownback, then issued an indefinite recess.
Hamdan has maintained he never supported terrorism, was not an al-Qaida member and only earned a pittance driving bin Laden.
"These commissions were intended for people like Osama bin Laden,
not a mechanic who drove people around," said Hamdan's
military-appointed defense lawyer, Lt. Cmdr. Charlie Swift. "The fact
that we're doing this will taint the reputation of military justice for
years to come."
Hamdan's petition is one of more than 60 similar challenges, arguing
that the commissions are illegal and should not have jurisdiction.
Since a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June cleared the way for
detainees to challenge their detentions in U.S. courts, civilian
attorneys have poured into Guantanamo to meet with clients.
Some of the 550 prisoners from more than 40 countries have been held
for nearly three years, but few have had access to attorneys and only
four have been charged.
Since President Bush
ordered the commissions, defense attorneys have said the rules are so
vague that a fair trial is impossible. There is no specific appeal
process, and lawyers are still debating what type of evidence can be
used during trials.
The review tribunals were set up after the Supreme Court decision,
and since then more than 300 cases have been reviewed. Only one man, a
Pakistani, has been freed.
© 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Purchase this AP story for reprint.