=============================================================================

Paper Number:

Paper Title:

Authors:

Reviewer:

=============================================================================

For the next several queries, please rate the paper on a scale of 1-4, 
where the quality increases as the number increases. A rating of 1 is 
the lowest (worst) and a rating of 4 is the highest (best).  Mark each
category with "1", "2", "3", or "4".

[ ] Originality (Does the paper make an original contribution?)
[ ] Technical merit (Is the paper technically sound?)
[ ] Clarity (Was the paper clear and easy to understand with proper English?)
[ ] Overall rating (What is your general impression of the paper?)
[ ] Confidence (Your technical confidence in the review.) 

=============================================================================

Recommended action (mark one with a "X")

[ ] REJECT 
[ ] Weak REJECT 
[ ] Weak ACCEPT 
[ ] ACCEPT 

=============================================================================

Comments to authors (these comments will be sent to the paper authors)


   ---- cut and paste comments here ---- 

=============================================================================

Comments for workshop organizers (these comments will not be sent to the
paper authors)

   ---- cut and paste comments here ----

=============================================================================