On Revision

by Jeff Galin, English Department,
adapted from an article by David Bartholomae

There are significant differences between writing and revising, which is more than a difference of time or place. The work is different. In the first case you're working on a subject-finding something to say and getting words down on paper (often finding something to say by getting words down on paper). In the second you're working on a text, on something that has been written on the subject as it is represented by the words and ideas on the page the first time through.

Revision allows you the opportunity to work more deliberately than you possibly can when you're struggling to get ideas together and words on the page the first time through. It gives you the time and occasion to reflect, question, and reconsider what you have written. The time to do this is not always available when you're caught up in the confusing rush of collecting your thoughts and composing in an initial draft. In fact, it is not always appropriate to challenge or question what you write while you are writing, since this can block thoughts that are eager for expression, divert attention from the task of getting words on the page and, in extreme cases, paralyze a writer completely.

A major job for the writer in revising a paper, then, is to imagine how the text and the ideas represented in it might be altered, presumably, for the better. This is seldom a simple, routine or mechanical process. You are not just copying-over more-neatly.

What, for example, does it mean for a text to be "better"? Is the better paper simpler, clearer, easier to read? Is it more complex, dense or difficult? Is the better paper more assertive or more suggestive? More elaborate or more straightforward? Revision allows the writer to imagine the problems the draft might pose for a reader: Can s/he follow? Will s/he be convinced? Will s/he understand? Do connections need to be more explicit? It allows the writer to consider, for his own purposes, what s/he has said: What am I doing? What points am I trying to make? Who notices such things? Who has such ideas? What are the counter-examples? The counter arguments? The second thoughts?

Let's pose the following as some "modes" of revision: